<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Touch-Screen Antagonists</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ux.buzzspree.com/touch-screen-antagonists/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ux.buzzspree.com/touch-screen-antagonists/</link>
	<description>User Experience blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Feb 2009 02:06:41 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: gary</title>
		<link>http://ux.buzzspree.com/touch-screen-antagonists/comment-page-1/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>gary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 13:20:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ux.buzzspree.com/?p=95#comment-9</guid>
		<description>Hi Ananya
I&#039;m not proposing we use touch screen for everything. It introduces some very tricky limitations. (In fact, although I am  interested in the movement of laptops including touch screens, I am dubious to the usefulness of this.)

I&#039;m only pointing out that the linked news article is pretending there is some kind of touch screen backlash - bordering on a movement. I don&#039;t believe it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Ananya<br />
I&#8217;m not proposing we use touch screen for everything. It introduces some very tricky limitations. (In fact, although I am  interested in the movement of laptops including touch screens, I am dubious to the usefulness of this.)</p>
<p>I&#8217;m only pointing out that the linked news article is pretending there is some kind of touch screen backlash &#8211; bordering on a movement. I don&#8217;t believe it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ananya Vetaal</title>
		<link>http://ux.buzzspree.com/touch-screen-antagonists/comment-page-1/#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>Ananya Vetaal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 05:49:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ux.buzzspree.com/?p=95#comment-8</guid>
		<description>Of course, touch screen doesn&#039;t suit to every context and situation. Its just a mode of interaction that looks cool and might be useful in some specific situations. That doesn&#039;t mean that we start using touchscreen for everything we have been doing easily so far through other modes of interaction.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course, touch screen doesn&#8217;t suit to every context and situation. Its just a mode of interaction that looks cool and might be useful in some specific situations. That doesn&#8217;t mean that we start using touchscreen for everything we have been doing easily so far through other modes of interaction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
